Neena Gopal – SAWM Sisters https://dev.sawmsisters.com South Asian Women in Media Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:20:07 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 https://dev.sawmsisters.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/sawm-logo-circle-bg-100x100.png Neena Gopal – SAWM Sisters https://dev.sawmsisters.com 32 32 Gota’s gotta go, Lankans say, Destination Uganda? https://dev.sawmsisters.com/gotas-gotta-go-lankans-say-destination-uganda/ Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:20:07 +0000 https://sawmsisters.com/?p=4507 Visitors to one of the many homes of the embattled President of Sri Lanka, Gotabaya Rajapaksa — now facing a wave of street protests over a crippling economic meltdown — almost always stop to admire an unusual ‘aquarium’ in the living room.]]>

This story first appeared in Deccan Herald

Visitors to one of the many homes of the embattled President of Sri Lanka, Gotabaya Rajapaksa — now facing a wave of street protests over a crippling economic meltdown — almost always stop to admire an unusual ‘aquarium’ in the living room.

Not only is it on the floor, covered with a sheet of glass, the fish in the water body isn’t your usual garden variety goldfish, but a school of man-eating piranhas!

The President’s choice of pet fish — straight from James Bond villain Blofeld’s playbook — epitomises not just his luxe lifestyle, but his ‘take no prisoners’ persona of conducting business, in keeping with the image he’s carefully cultivated as the ‘Terminator’. The annihilation of the separatist Liberation Tigers for Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in the long-running 30-year battle, powered him to the presidency in the 2019 polls, polling 6.9 million votes for himself, and a massive two-thirds majority for his Sri Lanka Podujana Perumana Party; the whispered silencing of nearly every one of his critics, the stuff of legend.

Mangala Samaraweera, who served as both finance and foreign minister in then-president Mahinda Rajapaksa’s cabinet, was only sacked from the job when he was suspected of tracking where the Rajapaksas parked their wealth. Others paid a much bigger price. The ‘white-van disappearances’ targeted close family friend and journalist Lasantha Wickrematunga, editor of the Sunday Leader, gunned down at a traffic light in the heart of the capital Colombo in 2009 as he drove to work.

Wickrematunga’s letter, revealed post-assassination, named Mahinda – Gotabaya’s elder brother, two-term president and head of the family — was a shocking indictment of the clan’s brute tactics in silencing critics.

Fewer dare to speak of Gota’s rumoured meltdown when he served in the army as a young soldier and reportedly sought an honourable discharge!

The difference between then and now, 13 years after he led the slaughter of the Tamil Tigers as Mahinda’s defence minister, is that Gotabaya has overnight turned into his country’s most reviled leader; as has the rest of the family, five of whom held top posts in the recently dissolved cabinet — including younger brother Basil Rajapaksa, who was finance minister until April 4.

The resignations, seen as a move to buy time, are unlikely to help shift the blame away from the first family for the economic mess the country finds itself in, or stop them from facing the music. Based on a complaint that he was “misusing public funds”, a Colombo magistrate has already ruled that the Governor of the Sri Lankan central bank, Ajith Nivard Cabraal, a key presidential aide, cannot leave the country.

The Rajapaksas are under public scrutiny, too.

The economic crisis, with foreign reserves down to an estimated $1.7 bn and gold reserves down to $29 mn, has been a long time coming. Indeed, on Tuesday, Sri Lanka defaulted on payments on $51 bn of external debt. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, Executive Director at Colombo’s Centre for Policy Alternatives, blames it on the “systemic failure of the government, its profligate spending to boost its own popularity rather than safeguard the economy.”

Former President Mahinda’s wooing of Chinese investment to build white elephants such as the international port facility in hometown Hambantota and capital Colombo are only two examples of many such projects that yield no revenue. The famed Lotus Tower convention centre, an international airport at Mattala, a cricket stadium named after the Rajapaksas, and a string of highways are other examples of wasteful expenditure. Raising public sector employment in government and the military in peace time, with the attendant costs of pensions eating up dwindling revenue, was in keeping with the Mahinda-Gotabaya ploy to use debt – the first International Sovereign Bonds were tapped as early as 2007 — to ensure their popularity among the gullible populace, just like Gotabaya’s tax cuts in 2019, which favoured a select few.

The blinkers are now off. The popular uprising that has exploded on the streets of Colombo, gathering pace across this once prosperous country, has angered the very same Sinhala majority that had catapulted the Rajapaksas to power.

Dubbed Sri Lanka’s ‘Arab Spring’, the protesters do include members of the Tamil-speaking minority whose war-ravaged north continues to cry out for re-development, as much as justice for war crimes — the UNHRC is reportedly set to charge the President on this count. But the hundreds of thousands who are laying siege to the presidential secretariat on Colombo’s seafront have little or no political leanings. They are drawn not just from the Sinhala-speaking majority, but also Muslims, Catholics, and the clergy — both Buddhist and Christian — with nary a political leader in sight. A prominent Buddhist monk who had led poll rallies for the Rajapaksas was booed out of one such protest. Holding placards and shouting slogans are Sri Lanka’s educated and aware, young and old, doctors and factory workers, as well as fruit vendors and IT professionals, cutting across the ethnic and class divides.

Unlike even a few months ago, the fury against the Rajapaksas is because their mishandling of the economy now impacts their daily lives. The depleted forex reserves have made it near impossible to import fuel and food, causing a widespread food shortage, and the misery made worse with crippling 13-hour power cuts that have brought hospitals and all vital services to a grinding halt.

The deeply unpopular – and ill-considered — move by Gota’s government to ban the use of chemical fertilisers in this agricultural hub, with the government only allowing the import of unaffordable organic fertiliser, was a death blow to the hugely lucrative tea industry, and cultivation of staples like paddy, vegetables and fruit, making it impossible for the common man to afford even the basic necessities.

“My fruit vendor asked me not to bargain as I usually do as he didn’t have enough money to even buy food for his children,” said a resident of Galle Face, who ended up buying the whole cart of fruits and giving the tearful orange seller a set of clothes for his family for the new year on April 13-14.

This is when protests are expected to turn violent, with sources close to the government leaking the minutes of a meeting on how pro-government rowdy elements would be introduced to create the circumstances that would bring in the army and the imposition of a possible Emergency.

The first big blow to the man on the street came with the huge drop in tourism earnings after the Easter bombings of 2019, followed by tourist numbers dipping alarmingly from an average of 2.52 mn visitors in the previous years to a mere 540,000 in 2020, with tourist sector earnings declining from $ 5 bn to $ 1 bn post-pandemic. With remittances from the Middle East shrinking as thousands lost their jobs, and inflation peaking at 18.7%, the island nation’s largely prosperous 22 million population is now increasingly stretched.

Stoking the people’s rage further are the persistent — if hitherto unproven — reports of the first family robbing the exchequer and looting the economy, amid growing calls for seizure of the Rajapaksas’ properties and assets abroad. The finger-pointing at Basil’s dual citizenship, alongside questions resurfacing on whether Gotabaya had, in fact, given up his US citizenship, a criterion to be eligible for the presidency, have now reached a crescendo, with the Opposition calling for the abolition of the Executive Presidency brought in through the 20th Amendment to the Constitution, which gave Gota sweeping powers.

Gota has set up a panel to address the economic distress, and has approached the IMF for talks to restructure outstanding international sovereign bonds that amount to $12.55 billion, and seek a moratorium on the $1 billion in payments due this July. But in a reflection of government ineptitude, within 24 hours of appointing Ali Sabry as the new Finance Minister, Sabry put in his papers, but with no one else willing to take his place, returned to his post!

Gota had dispatched his brother and then Finance Minister Basil a number of times to India this past year, with the same motive, putting aside the past game of playing Delhi off against Beijing, a ploy that had infuriated the Narendra Modi government, particularly when he scrapped the Colombo Port Terminal project that had been promised to India, and handed it over to China. Adding to India’s ire, Gota handed over three islands in the north, barely 50 km from the Indian coastline to China. The Rajapaksas have since made amends by offering India an alternative to the Colombo port project and scrapping the development of the three islands with China and handing it over to India. In turn, Delhi has extended a $2.5 billion credit line and sent food and goods to its beleaguered neighbour and may well sign off on another $500 million credit line for fuel.

China’s cold shoulder is no mystery. “If China agreed to do this for Sri Lanka, it would set a very bad precedent for other countries in the China debt trap,” explains Sravannamuttu, who had urged the Rajapaksas to approach the IMF to restructure the debt, which the brothers had refused to do till this week. Too late. On Tuesday, Sri Lanka announced that it had defaulted on all its external debt.

Either way, in characteristic Gota fashion, as the social media erupted last Friday, and mobs converged on the offices and homes of lawmakers, including one of the President’s homes in Mirihana where luxury cars were parked in the driveway on March 31, he declared an Emergency and announced a ban on social media. When he called it off within 48 hours, under intense pressure from the diplomatic community, one of the most popular memes doing the rounds under the #GoGotaGo hashtag is a screengrab of Mahinda’s son Namal Rajapakse with his baby son sporting Gucci baby shoes!

Namal’s family has reportedly fled the country already, but he has stayed on. But rumours of a flight of capital, showing three Sri Lankan airline aircraft heading to Uganda in February 2021 refusing to divulge the contents of the ‘paper’ cargo, and the controversy over Mahinda’s trip to the Indian temple town of Tirupati on a chartered flight that flew from Uganda’s Entebbe airport via the tax haven of San Merino, were also doing the rounds. Also circulating were reports of the close relationship between the Rajapaksas and the Sri Lankan Ambassador to Uganda and Kenya, Velupillai Kananathan, who hosted Mahinda and his wife during a visit to Kampala.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, a prominent businessman in Kampala told this reporter that it was common knowledge that Kananathan, whom The Sunday Times of Sri Lanka called “a racketeer and profiteer”, was involved in gun-running for the LTTE before he befriended the Rajapaksas. The comment could not be independently confirmed.

Also doing the rounds was a list of 10 companies that the Rajapaksas have reportedly invested in – most of them in Kampala but one each in Dubai and Liechtenstein. The family is named on the board of the Kampala-based companies which are largely real estate firms, heavy engineering and concrete manufacturing units, while the Dubai facility is a company set up to import oil from Qatar to Sri Lanka.

The Opposition alliance, led by Sajith Premadasa of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya, and former PM Ranil Wickremesinghe, backed by the Tamil National Alliance, have belatedly got into the act, attempting to cobble together a two-thirds majority, with plans to begin a no-confidence motion, and impeachment proceedings against the President. They are pushing for Gota to resign immediately, the Rajapaksas are playing for time.

As the protesters converge on Independence Square in the heart of Colombo, steadily upping the ante, the big question is: Will the Rajapaksas stay on and fight, or scoot.

Destination Uganda?

Link to original story

]]>
In Sri Lanka, India’s loss, China’s gain https://dev.sawmsisters.com/in-sri-lanka-indias-loss-chinas-gain/ Sun, 21 Feb 2021 05:16:48 +0000 https://sawmsisters.com/?p=3273 The Modi government’s ‘Neighbourhood Policy’ does not seem to be working with the Rajapaksas]]>

This story first appeared in Deccan Herald

The Modi government’s ‘Neighbourhood Policy’ does not seem to be working with the Rajapaksas

At a cabinet meeting chaired by Sri Lankan President Gotabhaya Rajapaksa on February 1, Sri Lanka abruptly scrapped the Colombo Port East Container Terminal project with India and Japan, delivering a body blow to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s much touted ‘Neighbourhood First’ policy that has been unable to forestall the re-entry of China into the Indo-Sri Lankan theatre; or, for that matter, in the rest of the ‘neighbourhood.’

The project was announced by President Gotabhaya himself on January 13 in the presence of India’s External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, who was visiting Colombo. What changed between January 13 and February 1? And why did India’s foreign policy mandarins not see this coming?

Was it payback by the island-nation’s first family, which India had alienated when it worked behind the scenes to edge Gotabhaya’s brother Mahinda Rajapaksa (who is now Prime Minister) out of the presidential office in 2015? Or was it more than just that? The multiple ramifications of the move go beyond a simple tit-for-tat settling of scores by the Rajapaksas.

With Sri Lanka reeling under an economic downturn, post the Easter bombings and the pandemic, Beijing has gone back to being Colombo’s main benefactor, with the door now open for it to take control of India’s strategic underbelly.

That President Rajapaksa used specious objections by trade unions protesting against handing over the project to foreign interests as the reason for going back on the 2019 deal gives weight to the charge of a Chinese role in scuppering the project, which would have had the much-favoured Adani Group as the major investor in the port development. Currently, more than 80% of the cargo from there is India-bound.

Adding weight to the charge is the fact that China is developing the Colombo International Container Terminal right next door to ECT, and no trade union has raised an objection over it. This, despite the fact that a huge parcel of land, some 50 acres along the harbour in the capital, has become the sole property of Beijing.

As Colombo-based security and geopolitical analyst Asanga Abeyagoonasekera remarked on the Rajapaksa government’s unilateral decision to back out of the ECT citing local protests: “When did geopolitics become the preserve of local trade unionists? When did they start to decide our foreign policy?”

At the same cabinet meeting, Gotabhaya signed off on a Chinese renewable energy project in three islands off the coast of Jaffna, barely 50 km from Rameswaram in Tamil Nadu. This is the third big-ticket Chinese investment, after the Hambantota Port project and the Colombo container terminal.

Hambantota, which had been first offered to India in 2009, was the first move in Beijing’s playbook to use investments to gain a strategic foothold in this critical waterway. (India’s foot-dragging extended to its inability to move forward on upgrading oil tankers leased to the Indian Oil Corporation in 2003 in the deep sea port of Trincomalee, which would have given Delhi a strategic base on the critical north-east coast. Protests by another set of trade unions held that up).

The Modi government’s inexplicable silence over the ECT, even in the face of the consolatory offer of the “larger” West Container Terminal, is in marked contrast to the loud dinner diplomacy that Indian High Commissioner Gopal Baglay indulged in when he took office last year. He hosted Colombo’s power elite to a glittering dinner. On the guest list was the heir to the Mahinda Rajapaksa line, Namal, the prime mover behind greater Chinese investment in Hambantota.

Clearly, Colombo’s march back into Beijing’s embrace is unlikely to change. The docking of Chinese submarines in Sri Lanka in 2014 – during a visit to Colombo by then Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe – had raised concerns in India. Delhi’s worries have only increased with the Chinese presence in Colombo, and now, the three islands of Delft, Analativu and Nainativu.

China will now have the wherewithal to impose a chokehold in the narrow stretch of sea, and block trade and oil supplies, just as India and Vietnam have done in the Malacca Straits and the East China Sea. The islands will become a key listening post from where Beijing can monitor’s India’s southern naval operations all the way from Port Blair in the Andaman & Nicobar islands to Vishakapatnam in the Bay of Bengal to Kochi on the Arabian Sea coast and up to the Pakistani port of Gwadar at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, as part of its strategy to limit India’s remit in these waters.

Limiting India in its sphere of influence in South Asia is clearly a counter to its advance eastward, where India has been a willing partner with the US, Australia and Japan to thwart China as part of the Quad grouping in the Indo-Pacific. The Indian Ocean Region that Delhi has sought to dominate, in tandem with Bangladesh, Myanmar, the Maldives and Sri Lanka, backed by the US to keep Chinese expansionism at bay, is now going to be that much harder to secure. Beijing’s ability to take control of Colombo will not be easy to thwart.

The Rajapaksa government’s intent was evident with its Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena’s quick amending of his ‘India First’ policy to a ‘Sri Lanka First’ policy. Yet, when the Modi government dispatched Jaishankar to the island-nation in January, when President Rajapaksa announced the Colombo Port’s ECT project, he was blind and deaf to the Rajapaksas’ shift.

Insiders say that Jaishankar’s visit to a key Tamil leader, even a moderate like Sampanthan of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), and openly voicing support for devolution to the provinces, in what was widely seen as a move for the BJP to secure votes in the forthcoming elections in Tamil Nadu, was the proverbial red rag to the Sinhala majoritarian bull. The Rajapaksas had little choice but to move swiftly to appease their Buddhist vote bank, which is raising the false bogey of a return of the LTTE, with the TNA as a front.

Blindsided in Nepal, caught napping by China’s nibbling of border areas in Bhutan, Ladakh and Arunachal, and playing the long game in Myanmar, insiders say that India has had no answer, no forward policy, to thwart China’s mode d’emploi of building infrastructure projects such as ports and roads to gain influence across South Asia.

In a giveaway of China’s real intent, one of the key elements of the Sri Lankan port agreements not only bars all foreign countries from use of their ports, it asks for China to be alerted to all ship movement in and out of Lankan ports.

The changing equations between India and Sri Lanka are set to get a further twist with the arrival in Colombo on February 23 of Pakistan’s PM Imran Khan, one of the first South Asian nations used by China in its signature Belt and Road Initiative.

The timing of Khan’s visit is curious. It comes at a time when the Tamil diaspora has stepped up calls to the United Nations Human Rights Commission to re-open the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission report that had all but cleared the Mahinda Rajapaksa government of human rights abuses during the 2009 war against the LTTE.

The new report by Michele Bachelet, the UN Commissioner for Human Rights, however, is particularly damning. It states that “in the 12 years since the end of the war, Sri Lanka has failed to demonstrate that it has the political will to move forward on a domestic or a hybrid justice process and reparations for atrocity crimes committed during the war in 2009.”

Bachelet will call for “alternative international options for ensuring justice and reparations, including referral to the International Criminal Court, and restrictions and a travel ban on alleged Sri Lankan war criminals, and stronger presence of the body in Sri Lanka” when the UNHRC convenes later this week.

How Pakistan, a member, like India, votes will separate friend from enemy.

The Rajapaksa government’s worry also stems from the coming together of the Tamils and Muslims (whom they had successfully divided) in the east and the north. In a show of strength, tens of thousands from both communities embarked on a long march from Ampara all the way to Jaffna in the north, a fallout of the crackdown on Muslims post the Easter bombings in April 2019. The government banning burials of Muslim Covid-19 victims has made matters worse. The government’s cancellation of Imran Khan’s address to Parliament has not gone down well, either, especially with leaders like Rauf Hakeem of the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress.

Can India use this tiny window of opportunity, and put aside the hurt and embarrassment of the ECT, and offer to play the role of interlocutor with the Tamil people, with whom it shares a civilisational link that transcends boundaries, and expedite the many stalled projects to rebuild the lives of the Tamils, still reeling from the civil war that ended 12 years ago?

India’s Colombo conundrum could see some light with the appointment of the new Sri Lankan envoy to Delhi, Milinda Moragoda. Having served as one of the government’s main negotiators with the LTTE in 2002 when he was part of former Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe’s team makes him an ideal bridge to the Rajapaksas, though unconfirmed reports that his Sri Lanka Pathfinder Foundation, with close links to China, is a possible beneficiary of the ECT project and BRI largesse can only complicate matters.

If Delhi does not want to see ‘India’s Ocean’ turn into China’s backyard, it needs to step up at multiple levels, not take relations with Sri Lanka for granted.

(The writer was formerly Foreign Editor for the Dubai-based Gulf News and has reported extensively on Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the Middle East. She is the author of ‘The Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi’)

Link to original story

]]>
India Has Jaswant Singh to Thank for Close Ties With Saudi Arabia https://dev.sawmsisters.com/india-has-jaswant-singh-to-thank-for-close-ties-with-saudi-arabia/ Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:52:13 +0000 https://sawmsisters.com/?p=3057 Atal Bihar Vajpayee's foreign minister spotted a line in one of the ‘for your eyes only’ dispatches from Riyadh, that had then Saudi Crown Prince Abdulla bin Abdulaziz Al Saud asking, “Why has India forgotten us...”]]>

This story first appeared in The Wire

Atal Bihar Vajpayee’s foreign minister spotted a line in one of the ‘for your eyes only’ dispatches from Riyadh, that had then Saudi Crown Prince Abdulla bin Abdulaziz Al Saud asking, “Why has India forgotten us…”

As India mourns the passing of Jaswant Singh, one of its finest foreign ministers entrusted by Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee with building bridges with the United States, few know that he was single-handedly responsible for breathing life into ties between Delhi and Riyadh that had remained moribund for years.

Much of the credit for today’s close ties between the Gulf region and India is placed at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s door, post the premier’s own landmark visits to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in 2019, and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman’s visit to Delhi soon after the Pulwama attack in February 2019.

But the building blocks were crafted over 20 years ago, when then prime minister Vajpayee’s new foreign minister spotted a line in one of the ‘for your eyes only’ dispatches from Riyadh, that had then Saudi Crown Prince Abdulla bin Abdulaziz Al Saud asking, “Why has India forgotten us…”

Singh saw it as a sign that the goalposts were shifting and tasked the Ministry of External Affairs and the counter-intelligence agencies, Research & Analysis Wing and the Intelligence Bureau, to gauge Saudi intent. Neither the diplomats nor the spooks saw any merit in reaching out to a country they saw as deeply entrenched in the Pakistan camp.

But Singh foresaw a relationship that could go beyond the transactional, beyond the dependence on energy imports, and the safeguarding of the remittances of the 10 million Indians working across the Gulf. His aim was to construct a strategic shared vision of the neighbourhood, post the Gulf War, and hope to lessen the overarching hold that Pakistan then enjoyed in the region.

Singh’s path-breaking visit to Saudi Arabia would take another three years to come to fruition, when Saudi minister of state for foreign affairs Dr Nizar Obaid Al Madani finally arrived in Delhi with a formal invitation. In January of 2001, Jaswant Singh would become the first Indian foreign minister and the highest ranking Indian official to step foot on Saudi soil. Waiting to receive him at the airport was his counterpart, Saudi foreign minister Prince Saud bin Faisal. While that was no break with accepted protocol, the next few hours and days would be replete with much symbolism and some substance.

Singh and the prince would spend an hour, closeted in the limousine, right there on the tarmac, discussing everything from the contentious to the sublime, from Kashmir to the 50-60 years of support for Pakistan. In public, Prince Saud would make clear that “they valued ties with India, and that the Delhi-Riyadh relationship would not be influenced by Riyadh’s relation with other countries”, (a reference to Pakistan) and that Kashmir was a purely bilateral issue.

As Singh would later tell Talmiz Ahmed, the man he had hand-picked as his ambassador to Riyadh, “I like the Saudis.” There was little doubt, it was reciprocated. But then, Jaswant Singh, had a singular calling card, which the ruling Al Sauds who hail from the Najd region, recognised in the Barmer native with his deep roots in Rajasthan’s Thar desert. Here was someone with whom they shared a common desert heritage.

That came through in a three-hour conversation he would share with King Fahd bin Abdul Aziz, and later with Crown Prince Abdulla where they dwelt, among other things, on their mutual passion for horses. It would of course lead to the crown prince’s son, the young Prince Mitaib’s storied invitation to Singh to a farm just outside the city, where he was presented with three priceless Arab racehorses, that were later flown to India at not inconsiderable cost by the Saudis.

Ambassador Ahmed tells you how Jaswant Singh had asked him to explore the desert ancestry of the Al Sauds, the minute the Crown Prince brought up what he saw as India’s cold-shouldering of the Gulf state. Ahmed, who had earlier served in the modern city of Jeddah, would wake up to the Najdi connect, that would be an ice-breaker, only a full two years later.

While the Indian and Saudi delegations worked on a slew of agreements that would put in place the framework of a formal political engagement that would see visits to Delhi become more commonplace, first by Abdulla when he succeeded to the throne in 2006, and by the present Saudi Crown Prince last year, drawn by India’s then booming economy and a shared concern over terror after the 26/11 attack on Mumbai by Pakistani terrorists, there was one more incident during the Jaswant Singh visit in 2001 that moved the Al Sauds.

As Singh waited for an audience with the King in one of his plush palaces, India’s urbane foreign minister was drawn to the many black and white photographs and paintings of a bygone era, particularly one that showed a Bedouin woman riding a horse with her baby strapped to her back. Singh broke down in tears, finally admitting it was because it reminded him of his early childhood in the heat of the desert in his home town of Jasol when he rode with his mother.

As his family and legion of admirers bid farewell to the always warm and welcoming politician who never took umbrage if you disagreed with him, Jaswant Singh’s compelling contribution to opening the doors to transformational ties with the Gulf nations that have withstood the test of time, must not go unremarked.

Link to original story

]]>
India Has Jaswant Singh to Thank for Close Ties With Saudi Arabia https://dev.sawmsisters.com/india-has-jaswant-singh-to-thank-for-close-ties-with-saudi-arabia-2/ Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:52:13 +0000 https://sawmsisters.com/?p=3057 Atal Bihar Vajpayee's foreign minister spotted a line in one of the ‘for your eyes only’ dispatches from Riyadh, that had then Saudi Crown Prince Abdulla bin Abdulaziz Al Saud asking, “Why has India forgotten us...”]]>

This story first appeared in The Wire

Atal Bihar Vajpayee’s foreign minister spotted a line in one of the ‘for your eyes only’ dispatches from Riyadh, that had then Saudi Crown Prince Abdulla bin Abdulaziz Al Saud asking, “Why has India forgotten us…”

As India mourns the passing of Jaswant Singh, one of its finest foreign ministers entrusted by Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee with building bridges with the United States, few know that he was single-handedly responsible for breathing life into ties between Delhi and Riyadh that had remained moribund for years.

Much of the credit for today’s close ties between the Gulf region and India is placed at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s door, post the premier’s own landmark visits to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in 2019, and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman’s visit to Delhi soon after the Pulwama attack in February 2019.

But the building blocks were crafted over 20 years ago, when then prime minister Vajpayee’s new foreign minister spotted a line in one of the ‘for your eyes only’ dispatches from Riyadh, that had then Saudi Crown Prince Abdulla bin Abdulaziz Al Saud asking, “Why has India forgotten us…”

Singh saw it as a sign that the goalposts were shifting and tasked the Ministry of External Affairs and the counter-intelligence agencies, Research & Analysis Wing and the Intelligence Bureau, to gauge Saudi intent. Neither the diplomats nor the spooks saw any merit in reaching out to a country they saw as deeply entrenched in the Pakistan camp.

But Singh foresaw a relationship that could go beyond the transactional, beyond the dependence on energy imports, and the safeguarding of the remittances of the 10 million Indians working across the Gulf. His aim was to construct a strategic shared vision of the neighbourhood, post the Gulf War, and hope to lessen the overarching hold that Pakistan then enjoyed in the region.

Singh’s path-breaking visit to Saudi Arabia would take another three years to come to fruition, when Saudi minister of state for foreign affairs Dr Nizar Obaid Al Madani finally arrived in Delhi with a formal invitation. In January of 2001, Jaswant Singh would become the first Indian foreign minister and the highest ranking Indian official to step foot on Saudi soil. Waiting to receive him at the airport was his counterpart, Saudi foreign minister Prince Saud bin Faisal. While that was no break with accepted protocol, the next few hours and days would be replete with much symbolism and some substance.

Singh and the prince would spend an hour, closeted in the limousine, right there on the tarmac, discussing everything from the contentious to the sublime, from Kashmir to the 50-60 years of support for Pakistan. In public, Prince Saud would make clear that “they valued ties with India, and that the Delhi-Riyadh relationship would not be influenced by Riyadh’s relation with other countries”, (a reference to Pakistan) and that Kashmir was a purely bilateral issue.

As Singh would later tell Talmiz Ahmed, the man he had hand-picked as his ambassador to Riyadh, “I like the Saudis.” There was little doubt, it was reciprocated. But then, Jaswant Singh, had a singular calling card, which the ruling Al Sauds who hail from the Najd region, recognised in the Barmer native with his deep roots in Rajasthan’s Thar desert. Here was someone with whom they shared a common desert heritage.

That came through in a three-hour conversation he would share with King Fahd bin Abdul Aziz, and later with Crown Prince Abdulla where they dwelt, among other things, on their mutual passion for horses. It would of course lead to the crown prince’s son, the young Prince Mitaib’s storied invitation to Singh to a farm just outside the city, where he was presented with three priceless Arab racehorses, that were later flown to India at not inconsiderable cost by the Saudis.

Ambassador Ahmed tells you how Jaswant Singh had asked him to explore the desert ancestry of the Al Sauds, the minute the Crown Prince brought up what he saw as India’s cold-shouldering of the Gulf state. Ahmed, who had earlier served in the modern city of Jeddah, would wake up to the Najdi connect, that would be an ice-breaker, only a full two years later.

While the Indian and Saudi delegations worked on a slew of agreements that would put in place the framework of a formal political engagement that would see visits to Delhi become more commonplace, first by Abdulla when he succeeded to the throne in 2006, and by the present Saudi Crown Prince last year, drawn by India’s then booming economy and a shared concern over terror after the 26/11 attack on Mumbai by Pakistani terrorists, there was one more incident during the Jaswant Singh visit in 2001 that moved the Al Sauds.

As Singh waited for an audience with the King in one of his plush palaces, India’s urbane foreign minister was drawn to the many black and white photographs and paintings of a bygone era, particularly one that showed a Bedouin woman riding a horse with her baby strapped to her back. Singh broke down in tears, finally admitting it was because it reminded him of his early childhood in the heat of the desert in his home town of Jasol when he rode with his mother.

As his family and legion of admirers bid farewell to the always warm and welcoming politician who never took umbrage if you disagreed with him, Jaswant Singh’s compelling contribution to opening the doors to transformational ties with the Gulf nations that have withstood the test of time, must not go unremarked.

Link to original story

]]>